The Federal Trade Commission has filed a lawsuit against Zillow, accusing the real estate giant of paying rival Redfin $100 million to eliminate competition in online property listings. The legal action targets a February 2025 agreement that allegedly made Redfin an exclusive syndicator of Zillow listings while reducing Redfin’s own competitive offerings.
Details of the Alleged Anti-Competitive Agreement
The FTC’s complaint centers on a February 2025 deal that transformed the relationship between the two real estate platforms. According to the lawsuit, Redfin agreed to become “an exclusive syndicator of Zillow listings” and began copying listings from Zillow rather than creating its own independent database. This arrangement allegedly gave Zillow unprecedented control over the online real estate listing market.
The agency further alleges that Redfin agreed to terminate contracts with advertising customers as part of the deal, effectively ceding market share to Zillow. This move, the FTC claims, was designed to reduce head-to-head competition between the companies. The FTC’s legal filing states the agreement represents “an end run around competition that insulates Zillow from head-to-head competition on the merits with Redfin for customers advertising multifamily buildings.”
Impact on Consumers and Market Competition
The FTC warns that the Zillow-Redfin arrangement could lead to higher prices and worsening terms for both renters and advertisers. By reducing competition in the online real estate platform space, consumers may face limited choices and potentially higher costs for rental and advertising services. The agency’s press release emphasizes that such agreements ultimately harm consumers by restricting market options.
Industry experts note that the online real estate market has become increasingly concentrated in recent years. According to Statista market research, Zillow and Redfin collectively control significant portions of the digital real estate advertising space. The alleged agreement between these two major players raises concerns about market consolidation and its effects on competition. Real estate professionals have expressed worry that reduced competition could lead to increased advertising costs that would ultimately be passed on to consumers.
Company Responses and Defense Arguments
Zillow has vigorously defended the agreement, calling it “pro-competitive and pro-consumer” in a statement published by CNN. The company argues that “our listing syndication with Redfin benefits both renters and property managers and has expanded renters’ access to multifamily listings across multiple platforms.” Zillow maintains that the partnership actually increases consumer choice rather than restricting it.
Redfin similarly disputes the FTC’s characterization, explaining that “by the end of 2024, it was clear that the existing number of Redfin advertising customers couldn’t justify the cost of maintaining our rentals sales force.” The company contends that partnering with Zillow allowed them to cut operational costs while investing more in rental-search innovations that benefit apartment seekers. Both companies have indicated they plan to fight the lawsuit vigorously.
Broader Legal Context and Potential Consequences
This lawsuit represents the latest in a series of legal challenges facing Zillow. In June 2025, real estate brokerage Compass filed its own lawsuit accusing Zillow of anti-competitive practices. The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division has shown increased interest in technology platform competition in recent years, suggesting this case could have implications beyond the real estate sector.
The FTC has asked the court to terminate the Zillow-Redfin agreement and consider requiring divestiture of assets. If successful, the lawsuit could reshape the online real estate market and establish important precedents for partnership agreements between competitors. The case also highlights the FTC’s increased focus on digital platform competition under current leadership.
References:
