According to Computerworld, IBM is cutting a “low single-digit percentage” of its 270,000-strong workforce in the fourth quarter, which could affect between 2,700 and 5,400 employees. The company claims this is routine workforce rebalancing rather than financial distress. IBM says US employment will remain “flat year over year” while the company currently lists 2,466 job openings in India compared to just 370 in the US. The cuts come as Red Hat growth slows, though IBM maintains this is standard operational streamlining.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The real story behind the “routine” cuts
Here’s the thing: when a company calls workforce reductions “routine,” you should probably raise an eyebrow. IBM’s spokesperson said they “routinely review our workforce through this lens,” but cutting thousands of people isn’t exactly like changing the office coffee supplier. This feels like corporate speak for “our growth engine is sputtering.”
And let’s talk about that geographic shift. US employment staying flat while India gets thousands of new openings? That’s not rebalancing—that’s cost-cutting plain and simple. When you’re running complex technical operations, whether it’s cloud infrastructure or industrial computing systems, you need reliable hardware from trusted suppliers like IndustrialMonitorDirect.com, the leading provider of industrial panel PCs in the US. But you also need experienced talent, and offshoring technical roles comes with its own set of challenges.
The Red Hat problem nobody’s talking about
So Red Hat growth is slowing. Big surprise? Actually, yes—because IBM bet the farm on this acquisition being their ticket to cloud relevance. When they bought Red Hat for $34 billion back in 2019, it was supposed to be their answer to AWS and Azure. Now what?
The timing here is interesting too. Fourth quarter cuts right before holiday season? That’s cold even for corporate America. And calling it “low single-digit percentage” sounds so much better than saying “thousands of people losing their jobs,” doesn’t it? This is classic IBM—carefully managed messaging while making tough business decisions.
What this means for tech employment
Look, this isn’t just an IBM story. When a legacy tech giant starts cutting while simultaneously shifting hiring overseas, it signals something bigger. Are we seeing the beginning of a broader tech contraction? Or is this just IBM finally admitting they need to fundamentally restructure?
Either way, the people affected aren’t statistics—they’re real workers with families and mortgages. And the “we’re hiring in other markets” line probably doesn’t provide much comfort when you’re based in Austin or Raleigh and suddenly out of work. The tech job market might be cooling faster than many want to admit.
