According to Inc., new data from ZipRecruiter’s 2025 Annual Employer Survey reveals that 63% of hiring professionals plan to increase headcount within the next year, signaling a dramatic reversal from the defensive staffing strategies that dominated recent months. The survey of over 1,500 hiring professionals shows 31% of HR officials will resume filling entry-level positions, while employee turnover rates plunged from 177% in 2023 to just 50% last year. ZipRecruiter labor economist Nicole Bachaud described this shift as “The Great Freeze” giving way to “The Great Thaw,” with companies already adapting by dropping degree requirements and incorporating skills assessments. This emerging trend suggests the labor market stagnation that set in nearly half a year ago may soon be broken by robust business recruitment.
Table of Contents
The Underlying Labor Market Transformation
What the survey data reveals is more than just cyclical recovery—it’s evidence of fundamental structural changes in employment dynamics. The dramatic drop in turnover from 177% to 50% represents one of the most rapid labor market stabilizations in modern economic history. This isn’t merely about companies resuming hiring; it’s about the entire employer-employee relationship being reset after the volatility of the post-pandemic period. The “Great Freeze” period served as a necessary corrective to the unsustainable churn of the “Great Resignation,” allowing organizations to consolidate operations and reassess their talent strategies without the pressure of constant recruitment.
The Coming Compensation Conundrum
The most immediate challenge for employers will be managing the inevitable wage pressures that accompany this hiring surge. With 57.3% of companies having avoided increasing base pay for new hires and 45.8% keeping existing employee salaries flat during the freeze period, there’s substantial pent-up compensation demand. The survey’s finding that 33.6% of employers lost candidates due to pay demands and 39.7% saw offers rejected for being too low indicates we’re already seeing early wage pressure that will intensify as hiring accelerates. This creates a particularly difficult balancing act for companies that benefited from salary stability during the freeze but now face competitive pressures to attract talent in a thawing market.
AI’s Dual Role in the Thaw
The survey’s finding that over half of respondents believe AI has created rather than destroyed jobs represents a significant shift in the technology’s perception among employers. More importantly, the 12-percentage-point gap between small business AI adoption (47%) and enterprise implementation suggests smaller companies are leveraging technology to compete more effectively in talent acquisition. This adoption pattern contradicts the conventional wisdom that larger organizations lead technological transformation, indicating that recruitment platforms and AI tools are becoming equalizers in the labor market. The technology isn’t just streamlining hiring processes—it’s fundamentally changing how companies identify and evaluate talent, particularly through skills-based assessments that reduce reliance on traditional credentials.
The Credentialism Crackdown
The move away from college degree requirements—reported by 38% of survey respondents—signals a broader rethinking of hiring qualifications that extends beyond temporary market conditions. This trend represents a permanent shift toward skills-based hiring that began before the freeze but accelerated during it. Companies discovered they could maintain operations with different credential mixes, and now that they’re hiring again, they’re applying those lessons to access broader talent pools. This has profound implications for labor economics, potentially reducing barriers to employment for non-traditional candidates while challenging the higher education value proposition.
The Retention Imperative
With 76% of respondents identifying employee retention as a main priority, companies face the delicate task of keeping existing staff satisfied while simultaneously recruiting new talent. The danger lies in creating a two-tier compensation system where new hires command premium salaries while existing employees see slower growth. Historical patterns suggest this dynamic often triggers increased turnover as tenured staff seek better opportunities elsewhere. Companies that navigate this transition successfully will likely implement transparent compensation frameworks and proactive retention strategies rather than reactive measures after key departures occur.
Broader Economic Implications
This hiring thaw arrives amid ongoing economic uncertainties that include potential import tariffs, workforce disruptions, and government policy changes. The speed and scale of the recovery suggest businesses have developed greater confidence in navigating these challenges, but the rapid shift from defensive to offensive staffing strategies could create its own volatility. If too many companies ramp up hiring simultaneously, we could see a return to the competitive dynamics that characterized the “Great Resignation” period, potentially forcing organizations into bidding wars for talent that undermine the stability gained during the freeze. The key differentiator will be which companies can balance aggressive growth with sustainable labor strategies that don’t recreate the conditions that necessitated the freeze in the first place.
