According to Financial Times News, the UK Financial Conduct Authority plans to ask a High Court judge later this month to lift the automatic suspension on its bond market data contract with Etrading Software. Ediphy Analytics sued the FCA in September, alleging a “technical fault” in the bidding software wrongfully excluded it from the competition. The lawsuit also claims the FCA failed to address a conflict of interest involving Stephane Malrait, who worked for winning bidder Etrading Software before joining the regulator’s board on October 20. Malrait resigned from Etrading Software about two weeks before his FCA appointment, but only after Ediphy questioned the perceived conflict. If the suspension isn’t lifted, lawyers believe the legal battle could take two years to resolve, potentially leaving the UK lagging behind the EU in bond market transparency.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Transparency Delay Problem
Here’s the thing about this legal fight – it’s not just about who gets the contract. The UK’s entire push for bond market transparency is now stuck in limbo. We’re talking about a consolidated tape that would aggregate pricing data across UK bond markets. Basically, it’s supposed to make everything more transparent and competitive. But now? The whole initiative is frozen because of this procurement challenge. And the timing couldn’t be worse – the EU is already moving ahead with its own bond tape. So the UK risks falling behind on exactly the kind of market infrastructure that was supposed to make it competitive post-Brexit.
The Conflict Questions Linger
Now let’s talk about that conflict of interest allegation. The FCA says there was no conflict because Malrait wasn’t involved in the decision-making process. He resigned from Etrading before joining their board. But here’s what makes people raise eyebrows – his resignation only happened after Ediphy started asking questions. That timing looks… suspicious, doesn’t it? Even if everything was technically above board, the appearance of potential conflicts can be just as damaging. In financial regulation, perception matters almost as much as reality. And when you’re talking about a contract this important, you’d think everyone would be extra careful about even the appearance of impropriety.
The European Competition Angle
What’s really fascinating here is that both companies are playing in multiple sandboxes. Ediphy actually won the EU’s bond tape contract back in July, while Etrading bid for that one too. Both companies were apparently willing to do the UK contract for free. Free! That tells you how valuable they see the positioning in this market. They’re basically fighting to become the standard for fixed-income data across Europe. And honestly, that might be the real prize here – establishing yourself as the go-to data provider for bond markets. The UK contract alone might not be the money-maker, but the strategic positioning? That’s worth fighting for.
What Happens Next?
So where does this leave us? The FCA will make its case to lift the suspension later this month. If they succeed, the project might only be delayed by months rather than years. But if the judge keeps the freeze in place? We could be looking at a two-year legal battle. Two years is an eternity in financial markets. By then, the EU’s tape could be well-established, and the UK might have missed its window to be competitive. The FCA could try to get the case accelerated given the contract’s importance, which might bring resolution by next year. But either way, this legal challenge has already succeeded in one thing – slowing down the UK’s bond market modernization. And in today’s fast-moving financial world, slowing down might be the biggest cost of all.
