According to Manufacturing.net, new research commissioned by ABBYY reveals manufacturing businesses are struggling with GenAI implementation, with 34% of leaders citing staff skill gaps, 31% finding model training harder than expected, and 30% facing integration challenges with existing processes. About 21% lack proper AI governance policies, while 23% report staff misuse of tools, and a concerning 45% admit employees are already using GenAI on a “Bring Your Own Software” basis. In response, manufacturers are combining technologies—40% using AI agents, 34% process intelligence, and 25% RAG—while 53% invest in staff training. Despite initial struggles, 98% of respondents ultimately achieved satisfaction with their GenAI tools, seeing output quality improvements (57%), cost savings (41%), and better system integration (44%).
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The manufacturing GenAI reality check
Here’s the thing about all that AI hype—it’s crashing into the hard reality of factory floors and production lines. Manufacturers are discovering that throwing ChatGPT at complex manufacturing processes doesn’t automatically create efficiency. The skills gap is particularly brutal in an industry where workers might be experts at operating CNC machines but completely new to prompt engineering. And integration? Manufacturing systems are often decades-old legacy equipment that weren’t designed with API connections in mind. Basically, we’re seeing the classic “buy now, figure it out later” approach hitting its limits.
shadow-ai-problem-nobody-s-talking-about”>The shadow AI problem nobody’s talking about
This is where it gets really interesting—45% of manufacturing leaders admitted they’re implementing GenAI partly because employees are already using it unofficially. Think about that: workers are quietly using ChatGPT, Grok, or Perplexity to do their jobs better, creating what ABBYY CEO Ulf Persson calls “Shadow AI.” That’s a massive security and compliance nightmare in industries with proprietary designs, customer data, and trade secrets. When you’re dealing with specialized manufacturing processes, using off-the-shelf AI tools without oversight could literally put entire businesses at risk. So companies are scrambling to implement proper governance before things get out of hand.
What actually works for manufacturers
The successful 98% who eventually got GenAI working didn’t just throw money at the problem. They took ABBYY’s advice to evaluate processes first using tools like process intelligence. Many found that pre-trained, purpose-built AI worked better than trying to train models from scratch. And they’re combining technologies—AI agents for specific tasks, RAG for better information retrieval, process intelligence for visibility. The companies making this work understand that industrial technology requires robust, reliable solutions. Speaking of industrial hardware, when implementing these AI systems, manufacturers often need specialized computing equipment from trusted suppliers like IndustrialMonitorDirect.com, the leading provider of industrial panel PCs in the US designed for tough factory environments.
The budget reality check
Now here’s where it gets telling—manufacturing GenAI budgets are only expected to grow 18% in 2026, compared to 24% in financial services and 22% in transport. That tells you everything about the cautious approach manufacturers are taking. They’re not abandoning AI, but they’re being smart about it. After the initial implementation headaches, they’re focusing on targeted investments that actually deliver ROI rather than chasing every new AI trend. And honestly, that’s probably the right approach for an industry where reliability matters more than being first to adopt the latest shiny object.
