Major Voting System Acquisition Shakes Election Landscape
A surprising development in election technology has emerged with the acquisition of Dominion Voting Systems by Scott Leiendecker, founder and CEO of Missouri-based electronic poll book manufacturer Knowink. The purchase places control of one of America’s largest voting machine companies in the hands of a former Republican Party operative, raising significant questions about election security and the future direction of voting infrastructure used by millions of Americans.
Leiendecker, who previously served as a Republican operative and election director in Missouri before founding Knowink, announced he would rebrand Dominion under the name “Liberty Vote.” The move, described in press materials as “a bold and historic move to transform and improve election integrity in America,” appears designed to distance the company from false allegations promoted by former President Donald Trump and his supporters that Dominion rigged the 2020 presidential election.
Rebranding and Promised Changes
The newly named Liberty Vote promises significant operational shifts, including becoming “100 percent American owned,” adopting a “paper ballot focus” leveraging hand-marked paper ballots, prioritizing third-party auditing, and committing to domestic staffing and software development. However, the press release provided no concrete details about how these changes would be implemented or what timeline would govern the transition.
This acquisition comes at a time when technology companies across sectors are facing increased scrutiny about their operational practices and security protocols. The voting machine industry represents a particularly sensitive segment where public trust is paramount.
Operational Challenges and Unanswered Questions
Dominion, the second-largest voting machine provider in the United States with systems deployed across 27 states including Georgia, has developed its software primarily in Belgrade, Serbia and Canada for the past two decades. LinkedIn profiles show numerous programmers and technical staff in Serbia who list Dominion as their employer, raising questions about how Liberty Vote will achieve its promised domestic staffing model.
The company hasn’t clarified whether it plans to rewrite hundreds of thousands of lines of code developed by foreign workers, relocate international developers to the United States, or replace them with American programmers. A Liberty official speaking anonymously told WIRED that Leiendecker “is committed to 100 percent … domestic staffing and software development,” while unnamed sources told CNN that Liberty will maintain operations in Canada, where Dominion machines are widely used.
Expert Skepticism About Security Claims
Election security experts have expressed skepticism about the emphasis on domestic staffing as a security measure. Philip Stark, professor of statistics at UC Berkeley and longtime election-integrity advocate, calls this focus a “red herring.” He notes that “programmers based in the US also … may be interested in undermining or altering election integrity,” suggesting that geographical location alone doesn’t guarantee security.
The situation highlights how major technology companies must navigate complex security and public perception challenges, particularly when their products serve critical democratic functions.
Audit Promises and Implementation Timeline
Regarding third-party audits mentioned in the press release, a Liberty official told WIRED the company would conduct a “third-party, top-to-bottom, independent review of [Dominion] software and equipment in a timely manner” and work with certification agencies to report vulnerabilities. The company hasn’t specified when this review would occur, though a representative told Axios it would happen before next year’s midterm elections, with machines being “rebuilt or retired” as necessary.
This approach reflects a broader trend in technology where companies are making strategic pivots to address market demands and public concerns, though the stakes are considerably higher when the technology in question supports democratic elections.
Broader Implications for Election Administration
The consolidation of election infrastructure under a single Republican-connected owner raises questions about partisan influence in voting systems. While Leiendecker has emphasized his commitment to election integrity, the concentration of control over a significant portion of America’s voting machinery with a former political operative warrants careful observation.
As Liberty Vote begins its rebranding and operational transformation, election officials, security experts, and the public will be watching closely to see whether the company’s actions match its rhetoric, and how these changes might affect the administration and public perception of future elections.
Based on reporting by {‘uri’: ‘wired.com’, ‘dataType’: ‘news’, ‘title’: ‘Wired’, ‘description’: ‘WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.’, ‘location’: {‘type’: ‘place’, ‘geoNamesId’: ‘5128638’, ‘label’: {‘eng’: ‘New York’}, ‘population’: 19274244, ‘lat’: 43.00035, ‘long’: -75.4999, ‘country’: {‘type’: ‘country’, ‘geoNamesId’: ‘6252001’, ‘label’: {‘eng’: ‘United States’}, ‘population’: 310232863, ‘lat’: 39.76, ‘long’: -98.5, ‘area’: 9629091, ‘continent’: ‘Noth America’}}, ‘locationValidated’: False, ‘ranking’: {‘importanceRank’: 166077, ‘alexaGlobalRank’: 1442, ‘alexaCountryRank’: 675}}. This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.
